<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: I'd watch it again! Review: I rented this movie the second it hit shelves, in fact I'd been pestering my local Blockbuster for a month about it before it even came out. Here is my 2 cents about the film. It's not normally a movie I'd be interested in (political stuff, 'y know?) but since Miranda Richardson has never let me down in her roles I'd been getting quite pepped up about it. (BTW... Mandy played Dinah Pellarin, Blake's wife)The story starts out with an interesting flashback of two little boys playing in a convertible. Then it flashes to the present where Blake Pellarin is giving a speach so he'll be elected governer. Anyway it goes into a huge political scandel when some pornography pictures are found. The man in them looks just like Blake. Of course it's then used to bribe him etc... There are some great scenes in it, I'll probally understand it better if I watch it again. I recommend it to almost anyone. I really enjoyed it, there was great casting!
Rating: Summary: I'd watch it again! Review: I rented this movie the second it hit shelves, in fact I'd been pestering my local Blockbuster for a month about it before it even came out. Here is my 2 cents about the film. It's not normally a movie I'd be interested in (political stuff, 'y know?) but since Miranda Richardson has never let me down in her roles I'd been getting quite pepped up about it. (BTW... Mandy played Dinah Pellarin, Blake's wife) The story starts out with an interesting flashback of two little boys playing in a convertible. Then it flashes to the present where Blake Pellarin is giving a speach so he'll be elected governer. Anyway it goes into a huge political scandel when some pornography pictures are found. The man in them looks just like Blake. Of course it's then used to bribe him etc... There are some great scenes in it, I'll probally understand it better if I watch it again. I recommend it to almost anyone. I really enjoyed it, there was great casting!
Rating: Summary: Fantastic Film About Sex and Scandal! Review: In the Clintonian era of mixed morals, the Big Brass Ring offers a compelling, multi-layered and extraordinarily moving portrait of American politics at the end of the 20th century. And of course, it all originates from an original screenplay by Orson Welles. Director George Hickenlooper has made a unique film of his own, and at the same time, has addes several Wellesian touches to create one of the most unique and underrated films of 1999. William Hurt, Nigel Hawthorne and Miranda Richardson give some of the finest performances of their careers. Richardson, by the way, was nominated for a Golden Globe award for her role as the estranged wife of gubernatorial candidate Blake Pellarin. This is a must see for any true cinema buff... If you love films like The Big Sleep, you'll be blown away by The Big Brass Ring.
Rating: Summary: remarkable ! Review: It's an up-to-date topic, more then ever - political scandals, lies and deceit. but this plays the essential part: in the end Pellarin ( W. Hurt ) decided for his brother and the truth! There were good actors, first of all William Hurt, he plays every part expressive, believable and convincing. Who 's interested in high-quality movies should go and see this film.
Rating: Summary: Good plot poorly presented Review: This is a murky story of politics, scandal, sex and deception. Sounds like it should have been a great film, but it wasn't. The basic plot was sound as we might expect from Orson Welles. But the way it was presented was too disjointed and abstruse. Without reading the original script, it is hard to tell if the responsibility for this lies with Welles, Oja Kodar (who did the adaptation) or George Hickenlooper, the director. I suspect it is the latter two. The biggest problem I had was character development. By the end of the film one should reasonably expect the pieces to fit together. Good character development should give us insight into the characters' motivation. I found this lacking. The flashbacks didn't really help us to understand the motivations of the characters as much as they should have. It seems that the brothers voluntarily switched identities, since Billy was wearing a name tag that said "Romero" on his uniform when he left to go to war. So, Blake really didn't steal his brother's identity as it appeared. This wasn't made very clear. There were lots of loose ends here. What motivated the limo driver to do what he did? Was it a need to be close to power, or some personal vendetta? Who knows? From a directorial and cinematography point of view, the film was far too dark, that is, underexposed. I'm certain they were trying for that look, but it made the photography look as if it were shot on 30 year old film of poor quality. Also, the audio was very bad. It was very difficult understanding a lot of the dialogue. William Hurt was miscast in this role. For certain films, his puling, self tortured style of delivery are appropriate to the character (Big Chill, Broadcast News, Children of a Lesser God). However, in this film his character required a more dynamic and confident portrayal, which he was unable to deliver. Nigel Hawthorne gave the best performance as Kim Mennaker, the Senator who brought the boys up. His ability to portray the old political warhorse, seduced by the trappings of power was excellent. Irene Jacob gave a good performance as Cela, the reporter with an obsession for the candidate and the truth behind him. Overall, the whole was less than the sum of the parts. The presentation was ponderous and uneven and the direction mediocre at best. Worth a 5/10. If you are looking for political campaign stories, there are better choices (Primary Colors, The Candidate, with Robert Redford).
Rating: Summary: Mediocre or a flawed masterpiece? Review: This may be a flawed masterpiece or perhaps a mediocre movie with a lot to recommend it. I enjoyed it and would like to see it again, partly to make sure the plot worked and partly to catch some nuances that I missed. And also because, as my esteemed colleague, flickjunkie, notes below, the audio is atrocious and my ears are not as sharp as they once were. But life is short and the entire opus of film is long...but maybe I can edit with the fast forward! Okay, let's look at the evidence. Script by Orson Welles: somewhat amazing since he died in 1985. His last work. That alone may make this worth watching. William Hurt plays a southern pol, Blake Pellarin, running for governor of Missouri. Miranda Richardson plays his rich, alcoholic wife, and she is very good. Nigel Hawthorne is Kim Mennaker, Blake's one time mentor, a shadowy, behind the scenes political figure, a cynical character who is writing a 27,000-page memoir, which no doubt includes much about his love for the Pellarin boys. Irene Jacob plays Cela Brandini, a TV reporter fascinated with Blake. The one-time protege of French-Polish director Krzysztof Kieslowski is not shown to advantage here. I'm not sure why, but there is little subtlety in the way she plays the part. To really appreciate what she can do, see her in La Double vie de Veronique (1991) or Trois Couleurs: Rouge (1994), both directed by Kieslowski. She is beautiful and very winning. William Hurt, contrary to some opinion, was excellent. His characteristic laid-back, almost languid style works strangely well for a southern pol. He is certainly different, but believable, although I don't think his style would have worked had his character been running for president, as in Welles's original script. (Incidentally, they really wanted Louisiana, not Missouri, for the locale.) Hurt's performance reminds me in some ways of his work in the outstanding but now somewhat neglected, Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985), for which he won an academy award. The Big Brass Ring never had a theatrical release, and it is not hard to see why. The print is too dark and the story too murky and hard to follow. It appears that the brothers changed identities when young and never bothered to change back. Apparently Blake's brother and not Blake was the subject of the homosexual photo, but I'm not sure. To make this movie work for a mass audience, the true status of the boys then, and during the time of the action, must be made clear.
<< 1 >>
|